Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Land Use Change an Overlooked Cause of Global Warming

ScienceDaily (Nov. 11, 2009) Georgia Tech City and Regional Planning Professor Brian Stone is publishing a paper in the December edition of Environmental Science and Technology that suggests policymakers need to address the influence of global deforestation and urbanization on climate change, in addition to greenhouse gas emissions.

According to Stone's paper, as the international community meets in Copenhagen in December to develop a new framework for responding to climate change, policymakers need to give serious consideration to broadening the range of management strategies beyond greenhouse gas reductions alone.

"Across the U.S. as a whole, approximately 50 percent of the warming that has occurred since 1950 is due to land use changes (usually in the form of clearing forest for crops or cities) rather than to the emission of greenhouse gases," said Stone. "Most large U.S. cities, including Atlanta, are warming at more than twice the rate of the planet as a whole -- a rate that is mostly attributable to land use change. As a result, emissions reduction programs -- like the cap and trade program under consideration by the U.S. Congress -- may not sufficiently slow climate change in large cities where most people live and where land use change is the dominant driver of warming."

According to Stone's paper, as the international community meets in Copenhagen in December to develop a new framework for responding to climate change, policymakers need to give serious consideration to broadening the range of management strategies beyond greenhouse gas reductions alone.

"Treaty negotiators should formally recognize land use change as a key driver of warming," said Stone. "The role of land use in global warming is the most important climate-related story that has not been widely covered in the media."

Stone recommends slowing what he terms the "green loss effect" through the planting of millions of trees in urbanized areas and through the protection and regeneration of global forests outside of urbanized regions. Forested areas provide the combined benefits of directly cooling the atmosphere and of absorbing greenhouse gases, leading to additional cooling. Green architecture in cities, including green roofs and more highly reflective construction materials, would further contribute to a slowing of warming rates. Stone envisions local and state governments taking the lead in addressing the land use drivers of climate change, while the federal government takes the lead in implementing carbon reduction initiatives, like cap and trade programs.

"As we look to address the climate change issue from a land use perspective, there is a huge opportunity for local and state governments," said Stone. "Presently, local government capacity is largely unharnessed in climate management structures under consideration by the U.S. Congress. Yet local governments possess extensive powers to manage the land use activities in both the urban and rural areas."

Save Your World is a company dedicated to saving Earth's natural resources world wide through the support of Conservation Projects such as the 200,000 Acre Rainforest Conservation Concession in Guyuana. Save Your World's product pledge of "1 PRODUCT = 1 ACRE OF RAINFOREST SAVED FOR 1 YEAR" helps preserve areas from deforestation and maintain them in their pristine state.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Save Your World Media Mentions week of November 8th, 2009

Save Your World is highlighted weekly in many organic and environmental consumer magazines and blogs around the world.

This week, Amazing Wellness Magazine and Better Nutrition Magazine placed Save Your World product information articles in their November editions. You can find these free magazines at your local organic or health store!

Amazing Wellness and Better Nutrition features our Save Your Hair Color-Safe Shampoo and Conditioner products available in Rainforest, Oasis Fruit and Regal Blossom aromas.

This unique shampoo and conditioner formula is scented with pure natural essential oils. No harsh chemicals - just natural and organic ingredients such as nutrient-rich, organic yerba mate to strengthen and revitalize stressed-out tresses. This product also contains natural UV protection in the form of Titanium Dioxide to help reduce the fading impact of the sun on color-treated and natural hair.

Save Your World goes to extra lengths to ensure our products are made in an environmentally-sensitive manner and pledge that:
  • Fair trade practices will always be our policy
  • No animal by-products will ever be used
  • No testing on animals will ever be done
  • Raw materials will be biodegradable
  • Packaging will be of recycled or recyclable materials
  • Products are paraben-free, contain NO 1,4-Dioxane, or Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
For more media mentions or additional information about Save Your World products or our mission, visit our website at www.saveyourworld.com and find us on facebook at www.facebook.com/SaveYourWorld.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Brazil: Deforestation sees biggest drop in 20 yrs

BRASILIA, Brazil – Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon dropped nearly 46 percent from August 2008 to July 2009 — the biggest annual decline in two decades, the government said Thursday.

Analysis of satellite imagery by the National Institute for Space Research shows an estimated 7,008 square kilometers (2,705 square miles) of forest were cleared during the 12-month period, the lowest rate since the government started monitoring deforestation in 1988.

"The new deforestation data represents an extraordinary and significant reduction for Brazil," President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said in a statement.

The numbers have been falling since 2004, when they reached a peak of 27,000 square kilometers (10,425 square miles) cleared in one year, according to the space research institute.

The government credited its aggressive monitoring and enforcement measures for the drop, as well as its promotion of sustainable activities in the Amazon region, an area in northern Brazil the size of the U.S. west of the Mississippi River.

But Paulo Gustavo, environmental policy director of Conservation International, said a major factor is the drop in world prices for beef, soy and other products that drive people to clear land for agriculture in the rainforest.

"The police control has improved a little, there has been success in controlling deforestation," Gustavo said. "But the main factor is the drop in commodity prices, which are the main factor in speeding up or slowing deforestation."

Satellite images from the space research institute have allowed government inspectors to increase enforcement, the government said.

The Brazilian Environment Institute reported confiscating about 230,000 cubic meters (8.1 million cubic feet) of wood, 414 trucks and tractors and 502,000 hectares (1.2 million acres) of land linked to illegal deforestation activities from August 2008 to July 2009. The government has also issued $1.6 billion in fines, the statement said.

Amazon deforestation causes 75 percent of Brazil's greenhouse gas emissions, according to the National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases.

By MARCO SIBAJA, Associated Press Writer

Save Your World is a company dedicated to saving Earth's natural resources world wide through the support of Conservation Projects such as the 200,000 Acre Rainforest Conservation Concession in Guyuana. Save Your World's product pledge of "1 PRODUCT = 1 ACRE OF RAINFOREST SAVED FOR 1 YEAR" helps preserve areas from deforestation and maintain them in their pristine state.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Dr. Dick Rice, PhD - Chief Conservation Officer for Save Your World Speaks in Monterey, CA


Dr. Dick Rice, PhD, Chief Conservation Officer for Save Your World was a recent guest speaker for two classes in Monterey, California on Monday November 2, 2010 at the Monterey Institute for International Studies (MIIS is a graduate school affiliated with Middlebury College), one at a class on conservation agreements, a subject that Dick is an expert in having created the World’s first conservation concession agreement, and one as a special speaker at the Environmental Speaker Series http://www.miis.edu/academics/programs/environmentalpolicy/speakers.

As Chief Conservation Officer for Save Your World, Dick advises Save Your World and encourages other companies regarding conservation opportunities around the world to further support conservation concessions and other initiatives to protect the environment worldwide.
Dicks Comments:
“In early December environment ministers and government officials from around the world will meet for two weeks in Copenhagen to try to iron out a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, the current global climate treaty. It is widely expected that the final treaty will include forest protection in the tropics as accepted tool for fighting climate change. That’s important since deforestation and other land uses account for about 20% of greenhouse gas emissions, more than the entire world transportation sector combined. Deforestation is also one of the primary causes of the global biodiversity crisis, with roughly 13 million ha, an area the size of Alabama cleared each year.

This issue is important to all of us since projects like the Guyana Conservation Concession could become candidates for funding as carbon offsets. Forest carbon projects are also expected to be allowed under climate legislation passed in the US (they are front and center in both the bill passed by the House of Representatives last summer and the current bill being considered by the Senate).

Conservation agreements are a great context for forest carbon projects because you have to have incentives in place to conserve the forest in order for an area to qualify for funding as a carbon offset and that is exactly what conservation agreements do. It can take an enormous amount of time and energy to put those agreements in place, so where they already exist, they are a precious commodity in terms of possible future carbon investments.”

Save Your World has a unique direct proposition to the consumer to provide them with the ability to fund Conservation projects directly through the purchase of Save Your World all natural and organic personal care products. There is no other company and very few other opportunities that allow consumer the means to directly impact their world in such a positive environmental way. Most initiatives support doing less harm rather than good. The Conservation projects that Save Your World is associated with are to provide direct contributions to saving pristine environments worldwide. The consumer benefits through the purchase of great environmentally safe products used every day and the environment is saved through the donations given for each product purchase and by no further damage to your world with harsh chemicals.

1 PRODUCT = 1 ACRE OF RAINFOREST SAVED FOR 1 YEAR

To learn more about the Conservation Concession and Save Your World products visit: http://store.saveyourworld.com/Learn-about-Save-Your-World-s-Conservation-Mission-s/19.htm

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Save Your Lips® Lip Balm Take 1st Place


H20 Magazine Announced their 2009 Beauty Awards in their recent Fall 2009 Issue. For the 2nd year in a row Save Your World has finished in top spots for our products. This Year one of our newest product brands Save Your Lips® has won 1st place in the Beauty Awards Lip category.
"Save Your Lips® moisturizing, nutrient-rich antioxidant lip balm is a special treat for your lips. This moisturizing but non-greasy lip balm protects your lips while also nourishing them with organic Aloe Vera and organic Yerba Mate. Cruelty-free, no parabens, just natural and organic ingredients"
Just one tube of this lip balm does so much for your lips but also for the environment because 1 acre of pristine rainforest is saved for 1 year with the purchase of this award winning lip balm.

Visit your local Vitamin Shoppe stores and find us near the register during the months of November, December and through January 2010. Or order online at www.saveyourworld.com.

Get a handful for stocking stuffers or to have in your car, at the office, in your purse and just about anywhere around the house. They come in three great flavors: Grapefruit-Mango, Green Tea or Pure (unflavored). These lip balm formulas also make a quick and convenient cuticle moisturizing stick.

To see the article in H20 magazine Click Here

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Your Health and Safety: How Safe Are Your Cosmetics?

Whether it’s shampoo, body wash or moisturizer, cosmetic and personal care products are supposed to make us beautiful – to help us strike a balance between inner and outer beauty. But have you read the ingredients list on the label of your favorite shampoo or lotion? You might encounter chemical names like phthalates, triclosan, paraben or the ever-elusive term, “fragrance.” What are these substances and what are they doing on your skin?

Recent research shows us the links between common ingredients in commercial products and harmful side effects.

Watchdog groups such as the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and researchers at Vassar College are finding that common culprits causing illness are found in the following chemical groups: phthalates, triclosan, paraben and musks. Byproducts of these substances such as sodium laureth sulfate and 1,4-dioxide are suspected carcinogens.

In particular, teens have high incidences of chemical exposure since they tend to experiment with different kinds of cosmetics and personal care products. According to a recent report published by the EWG, 16 different chemicals were found in the blood and urine samples of 20 adolescent girls aged 14 to 19. Research links these chemicals to health effects such as cancer and hormone disruption.1

Many personal care products contain phthalates. What are they? Phthalates are agents that help deliver moisture and allow chemicals to absorb into the skin. They help bind fragrance in body care products. Phthalates are also used to soften plastics used for toys, disposable plastic bottles and containers and medical equipment. Side effects include kidney, lung and liver damage, and female reproductive illnesses such as the early onset of puberty in girls, polycystic ovarian disorder and infertility. Continued phthalate exposure can trigger miscarriage and could be a cause of birth defects. Studies show prolonged use of products containing phthalates can increase the risk of asthma, allergies and type-2 diabetes.2

There are phthalate-free body care alternatives available, so exposure to this chemical group can be avoided. Purchase products in safer recyclable plastic containers marked with the numbers 1, 2 and 5 and avoid those labeled 3, 6 and 7.3

In addition to phthalates, some personal care products may contain mercury, toluene, petroleum distillates, parabens and any number of other chemicals that can cause cancer, harm the reproductive system and retard human development.4

Triclosan is an antimicrobial agent used to kill bacteria on the skin and other surfaces. It is found in a variety of personal care products frequently used on a daily basis such as bar and liquid hand soaps and toothpaste. Despite its widespread use in these products, triclosan is no better at killing germs than regular soap and water. Long-term use of triclosan has been linked to thyroid disorders. Moreover, triclosan can form toxic byproducts in tap water, endangering not only the local water quality but also the environment at large. The run-off of triclosan into local lakes and streams poses a toxic threat to fish and other aquatic life. Exposure to this chemical is widespread, as it has been detected in the blood, breast-milk and urine of over 75% of the American population.5

Aside from triclosan, parabens are a group of artificial preservatives found in various cosmetic and body care products. Parabens are chemicals used to extend the shelf life of products such as moisturizers, shampoos, conditioners, sunscreens, deodorants, antiperspirants and mascaras because they inhibit the growth of bacteria and mold.

So, you might ask, what are the potential risks associated with long-term exposure to parabens? Parabens have been known to cause allergic reactions and are known hormonal disruptors. In various studies performed in the EU and the US, parabens have been linked to incidences of breast cancer and estrogen disruption in women.

Parabens are also known contaminants. When parabens are combined with chlorinated tap water, paraben byproducts can form that create unsafe water known to kill aquatic life, in particular, coral.

The term “fragrance” conjures the fresh scent of fields of wildflowers, the crisp smell of clean linen, the deep, rich notes of cedar and sandalwood. But do you know the average perfume or cologne contains somewhere between 400 and 600 synthetic chemicals? Musks are the artificial chemicals used in products such as air fresheners, fabric softeners and personal care soaps and lotions. Long-term use of products containing musks can lead to hormone and reproductive disruption in women and can interfere with proper immune function.6

As with products containing no phthalates and triclosan, paraben-free and fragrance-free alternatives are available and switching to them can reduce long-term exposure. If fragrances appeal to you, look for products containing natural, essential oils instead of synthetic perfumes.

While the EU has banned the use of phthalates, paraben, triclosan and musk in commercial products, the use of these chemicals in cosmetics and body care products in the US lags behind and remains largely unchecked and unregulated. According to the EWG, the FDA has assessed for safety only 11% of the 10,500 ingredients found in hair and body care products.


If we used just one personal care product a day, we might not have to worry too much. But on a daily basis, Americans use an average of anywhere between 10 and 15 personal care products. Based on the EWG’s recent statistics, people apply an average of 126 to 178 different ingredients to their skin daily, making the cumulative impact of these chemicals particularly hazardous.7 Parents and teens should be especially careful in their selection and use of body care products to protect themselves against avoidable contaminants.

You can take steps to protect yourself and your loved ones from exposure to these chemicals. Here are some suggestions and resources to help you stay healthy and safe.

* Stay away from the “Dirty Dozen” in cosmetics and personal care products. In addition to the health concerns posed by the products discussed in this article, other additives pose similar health risks and should be avoided: coal tar, diethanolamine (DEA), formaldehyde, lead and mercury, nanoparticles, petroleum distillates, p-phenylenediamine and hydroquinone. See National Geographic’s “The Green Guide” for further information.

* Vote with your dollar. Carefully read the ingredient lists on product packaging to stay away from these chemicals. Suggest to your local pharmacy and supermarket that they carry more natural and organic personal care products or visit your local health food or natural product store to seek healthier alternatives.

* To learn more about cosmetic safety and the health concerns associated with certain ingredients in beauty care products, please consult the following resources:


o The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com")
o Environmental Working Group’s Shoppers’ Guide to Safe Cosmetics (http://www.ewg.org)
Environmental Risks and Breast Cancer Project from Vassar College (http://erbc.vassar.edu)
o National Geographic’s “The Green Guide” (http://www.thegreenguide.com)

References:
1 Rebecca Sutton, “Adolescent exposures to cosmetic chemicals of concern,” September 2008, Environmental Working Group, http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens
2 Rebecca Sutton, “Adolescent exposures to cosmetic chemicals of concern,” September 2008, Environmental Working Group, http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens
3 In addition to phthalates, containers using plastics labeled 3, 6 and 7 contain bisphenol-A (known as BPA). Long-term exposure to BPA has been linked to endocrine and hormonal disruption in laboratory animals. The use of BPA has rightly raised a good deal of controversy. It has been recently removed from many products such as baby and water bottles as a result of consumer action and activism. For further information, see http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/science/july-dec08/bpa_09-19.html
4 Personal Care - The World Women Want: http://www.theworldwomenwant.com/yourworld/care/
5 Rebecca Sutton, “Adolescent exposures to cosmetic chemicals of concern,” September 2008, Environmental Working Group, http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens
6 Rebecca Sutton, “Adolescent exposures to cosmetic chemicals of concern,” September 2008, Environmental Working Group, http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens
7 Rebecca Sutton, “Adolescent exposures to cosmetic chemicals of concern,” September 2008, Environmental Working Group, http://www.ewg.org/reports/teens

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Green and Climate-Friendly Televisions

Keep old TVs functional, find the greenest and least-toxic new ones, and learn about responsible electronics recycling.

Through the years, it’s become apparent that many Real Green readers aren’t big TV watchers. So our editorial staff thought we should warn you all that early next year, television broadcasters will transition completely from analog to digital broadcasting, meaning that any TV not equipped to receive digital broadcasts won’t get a signal after February 18, 2009.

The upside of this change is that compared to analog broadcasting, digital signals allow more information to be sent on a smaller group of frequencies, freeing up valuable airwaves for other uses, including public safety.

The significant downside, however, is that the switch is expected to send millions of analog television sets containing toxic components like lead-filled cathode-ray tubes to landfills—as people mistakenly assume they’ll have to toss their old TVs and buy new flat-screen models to navigate the switch.

Fortunately, with a little information, you can keep your old TV working for many more years. Below, we tell you how and also include tips on what to look for when you do need a new TV.


Keep Your Old TV
If you have an older TV at home, chances are it's a cube-shaped cathode-ray (CRT) set. No matter how ancient it is, your old television will likely do just fine after the switch. If you currently subscribe to a satellite or cable service, you’ll continue to get a signal after February 18, whether you have an analog or digital TV.

But if you use an antenna to watch TV, those over-the-air signals may cease after the switch. Fortunately, it’s easy and cheap to fix this problem and keep using your set. First, if your TV was made after 2003, it may have a built-in digital tuner. Look for labels on your set that say something like “integrated digital tuner” or “digital receiver built-in.” If that’s the case, you’ll still be able to get an over-the-air signal.

If your TV isn’t equipped with a digital tuner, you can use a set-top converter box to convert the digital signal to analog, so you can receive an over-the-air signal. Every US household is eligible to receive two $40 coupons from the government to purchase a converter, which range in price from $50–$75. Visit www.dtv.gov to find out how to get your coupons. And be sure to look for an Energy Star converter box to ensure that you’re using the most efficient model possible.

In terms of energy efficiency, CRT TVs do as well or better than comparable flat-screen models, so you won’t be saving much energy by making the switch. Therefore, your greenest option is to keep your CRT TV as long as possible, preventing more resources and energy from being used to make a new TV.


When Your Old TV Dies...
But maybe you really do need a new TV. In that case, you have a few new types to consider.

Some manufacturers are starting to phase out production of CRT televisions, in favor of new flat screen models, which generally have better picture quality and are much thinner and lighter. The more sophisticated flat-screen technology has also made extra-sharp high-definition (HDTV) images possible, as long as stations broadcast in high-definition.

When shopping for a new or used flat-screen television, you can choose an LCD (liquid crystal display), plasma, or rear projection TV. The technical differences between these three types are fairly complex (look them up at ConsumerReports.org if you’re curious). All three can be HDTV-compatible, so you’ll probably find picture-quality and price to be comparable among all three types. It’s the environmental impacts that can differ greatly.


Energy Efficiency Considerations

Let’s just state right off the bat that you want to avoid energy-hog plasma televisions. The average plasma TV uses more energy per year than a refrigerator, which is the biggest energy user in most US households, says the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE).

Another problem with plasma TVs is that the higher the resolution, or how sharp the image is, the worse they get in terms of energy use. Flat-screen TVs are available in 720p or 1080p resolution (the “p” stands for “pixels,” which are the little dots of light that make up your image). Resolution only matters with a plasma TV, because each pixel is illuminated separately—therefore, a 1080p plasma TV will use more electricity than a 720p plasma TV. Higher resolution in an LCD or rear-projection TV won’t affect their energy use because all of the pixels on the screen are illuminated by one light source.

No matter which TV you choose, it’s important to remember that size matters. If you swap your old 26-inch CRT television for a monstrous 52-inch LCD TV, you’re not going to save energy.

Though energy use among different models can vary widely, for a rough idea, Efficient Products.org, a Web site that researches the energy efficiency of consumer products, says that for smaller TVs less than 42 inches, LCD models are more efficient than CRTs. Rear-projection models are mainly available in larger sizes (50 inches and higher). If you want an enormous television, the rear-projection models tend to be more efficient than comparable LCDs or CRTs.

In the future, manufacturers are looking to mass-produce LED (light-emitting diode) and OLED (organic light-emitting diode) TVs, which may be even more efficient than current models.

Best models: Your most efficient option is an LCD TV less than 42 inches. CNET.com rated 128 flat-screen TVs by their energy use in October. (Find those ratings here.) Also, look for the Energy Star. While the program used to rate televisions based only on stand-by mode—meaning how much power they leak when turned off—starting in November, the ratings will change to also reflect power usage when the sets are turned on.

If you choose an LCD, you’ll want to have the set calibrated to a medium level of backlighting—instead of the torch-bright backlighting the manufacturer sets it to so the screen will look nice when displayed in stores. Check your manual to see if the set has a “home” setting you can select, or call an electronics professional to calibrate your TV. It will save energy and keep your TV from burning out quickly.

Also, remember that TVs leak power even when turned off. Plug your TV into a power strip, and switch off the strip to stop those leaks.


Climate Impacts
Earlier this year, Professor Michael J. Prather of the University of California–Irvine sounded the alarm about a hidden greenhouse gas that is often used in the production of flat-screen televisions. According to Prather’s research, nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), which is often used to clean flat-screen manufacturing equipment, is 17,000 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

While industry representatives have said they take precautions to contain NF3, Prather argues that companies may very well be lax about letting it escape, since it’s not regulated by the US government or under the Kyoto Protocol.

Fortunately, some companies are finding alternatives to NF3. Linde Electronics, a gas and chemical company, has created a process that allows pure fluorine to be used in place of NF3, says Steve Pilgrim, Linde’s global marketing manager.

“Fluorine has a global warming potential of zero,” says Pilgrim. “It’s also more efficient to use, so it’s cheaper. We’re doing our best to convert manufacturers to fluorine, either on the economic or the environmental argument. Performance is unaffected by which gas you use.”

Best models: So far, Toshiba–Matsushita Display and LG have converted much of their manufacturing operations to fluorine instead of NF3.


Toxic Innards

As more people are becoming aware, televisions and other electronics often contain hazardous innards. In addition to the lead problem with CRT TVs, chemicals like hormone disrupters polyvinyl chloride and brominated flame retardants, neurotoxic mercury, and more can be found in flat-screen and CRT TVs alike.

Best models: Samsung and Sony scored best on the “2008 Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics,” which ranks companies based on the toxicity of their products and whether they have robust take-back and recycling programs. Though Philips received a poor ranking from Greenpeace, its Eco-TV is less toxic than many models (see below).


Responsible Recycling
To ensure that old TVs don’t end up clogging landfills and leaking hazardous substances, it’s important for manufacturers to take their products back for recycling. However, irresponsible recyclers often send old electronics to developing countries like China, where organizations like the Basel Action Network (BAN) have reported seeing workers sort and dismantle toxic electronics by hand, unprotected. Recyclers listed on BAN’s Web site have pledged not to export e-waste and to recycle it responsibly. Find the list here.

Green America’s ResponsibleShopper.org also notes that many electronics companies, like Sanyo, Toshiba, and Sony, are tied to worker exploitation along their supply chains.

Best models: Samsung, LG, and Sony have the most robust recycling programs. Consumers can drop their Samsung electronics at 174 locations across the US. The company has pledged not to incinerate, landfill, or export its e-waste (it’s not a BAN signer).

LG (Goldstar, Zenith) has 160 drop-off sites across the US for its old electronics, which are recycled through Waste Management Recycle America, a company that is in the process of qualifying as a BAN-pledge signer. Sony has a similar program, also run through Waste Management.


In Short...
As their monetary prices come down, flat-screen TVs don’t have to come at a steep cost to human health and the Earth. Keep your old TV for as long as you can, and when you need a new one, encourage new green technology by buying green.



Posted from Green America
—Tracy Fernandez Rysavy