data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35cc6/35cc6a0aaa7a9a561f04ed1c30042707ecbfcd07" alt=""
Faced with the possibility of climate change, the international community is starting to talk about paying for the carbon storage that living forests provide. Growing trees store carbon dioxide, but 13 million hectares, or 32 million acres, of forest are razed each year, accounting for a significant portion of annual greenhouse gas emissions, according to scientists and other experts who met for climate talks last month in Barcelona.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8987e/8987e1376ad7691f45c4f6e7ff2f1959522d6428" alt=""
“The fastest way of reducing carbon emissions is keeping the forest standing,” she said in an interview here in September, ahead of this month’s Copenhagen conference on climate change. “All of the other measures we could take would take technology, time. But this we can do immediately. We just stop. We just stop cutting.”
That recognition, and advances in satellite imaging and carbon measurements over the past decade, have made a proposal for forest preservation, known as Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, or REDD, an important part of the climate treaty talks.
Guyana argues that forest conservation is critically important. If incentives are aimed only at encouraging countries with high deforestation, like its neighbor Brazil, to curtail logging, timber clearance will simply migrate from protected to unprotected countries, it says.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c18ae/c18ae9cdd978763171a99efbee1cedb4839f5a7c" alt=""
Critics protest that the value calculated by McKinsey — $580 million annually over 25 years — amounts to blackmail. But Ian Craddock, a British expatriate who runs an adventure tourism company in Guyana, disagrees.
“Guyana is a small, impoverished country that’s trying to develop itself,” he said. “And if the Western world isn’t going to protect the rain forest and start coughing up money to countries like Guyana, then they’re going to have to start using their resources. Just like England did for thousands of years, just like the States is doing and Canada is doing. You can’t be hypocrites about it.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65aba/65aba09b3b3a58398319a2cf07b153b75c76eadd" alt=""
To read the complete article Click Here
Excerpts of an Article from the New York Times Global Business Section
By ERICA GIES
Published: December 8, 2009